|  |  | NEUTROPHIL SIGNALING ALTERATION AFTER BURN SHOCK Shock 1998: Oxígeno, Oxido Nítrico y
          perspectivas terapéuticas
 Simposio Internacional, Academia Nacional de Medicina
 Buenos Aires, 30 abril 1998
 
 NEUTROPHIL SIGNALING ALTERATION: AN ADVERSE INFLAMMATORY
          RESPONSE AFTER BURN SHOCK
   MOHAMMED M. SAYEED Departments of Physiology
          and Surgery, and Burn and Shock Trauma Institute, Loyola University of
          Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA Key words: neutrophil signaling, burn shock, inflammation,
          oxidative cell damage Abstract  The
          inflammatory response syndrome in shock-like states might frequently
          be accompanied by an oxi- dative cell/tissue damage in one or more
          organ-systems in the body. The inflammatory response related
          hyperactivation of neutrophils can contribute to oxidative cell/tissue
          damage. Studies discussed in this review examined the role of cell
          signaling pathways in the hyperactivation of neutrophils in an early
          stage of burn injury shock. The studies were carried out in peripheral
          blood neutrophils isolated from rats with a 25% body surface area
          scald burn. Neutrophil cell signaling responses were evaluated by
          measuring cytosolic [Ca2+] and protein kinase C activity, and were
          correlated with neutrophil superoxide production. The cytosolic [Ca2+]
          and protein kinase C responses were highly upregulated along with
          enhanced superoxide production in the early phase of burn injury. The
          treatment of burn-injured rats with the calcium antagonist diltiazem
          abrogated enhanced Ca2+ and protein kinase C signaling and superoxide
          generation. The signaling upregulation in neutrophils could result
          from potentiation of actions of burn-injury induced chemotactic
          mediators on the leukocytes. The neutrophil signaling upregulation
          leading to increased superoxide generation could thus be responsible
          for the oxidative cell/tissue damage. The organ-system
          dysfunction/failure accompanying burn shock may be initiated with the
          oxidative cell/tissue damage. Resumen  Transducción
          de señales leucocitarias: respuesta inflamatoria adversa en el shock
          por quemaduras. El síndrome de la respuesta inflamatoria en estados
          de shock está frecuentemente acompañado por daño tisular debido a
          mecanismos oxidativos que afectan uno o más órganos. La
          hiperactivación de polimorfonucleares neutrófilos asociada a la
          respuesta inflamatoria puede contribuir al daño oxidativo que se
          observa en los tejidos. En esta revisión se discutirá el papel de
          distintas señales en la hiperactivación de neutrófilos en estados
          tempranos del shock térmico provocado por quemaduras (burn shock).
          Los estudios realizados fueron llevados a cabo con neutrófilos
          aislados de sangre periférica de ratas que tienen un 25% de la
          superficie corporal escaldada. La medición del calcio citosólico y
          la actividad de la proteína kinasa C fueron evaluados como medida de
          las señales recibidas por los neutrófilos y fueron correlacionadas
          con la producción de superóxido. La concentración de calcio
          citosólico y la respuesta de la proteína quinasa C, así como la
          producción de superóxido, estaban muy aumentadas en las fases
          tempranas de la injuria térmica. El tratamiento de estas ratas con
          antagonistas del calcio como el diltiazem elimina el aumento de los
          parámetros evaluados. El aumento de la capacidad de respuesta de los
          neutrófilos podría deberse a la generación de mediadores
          quimiotácticos por los leucocitos de animales que han sufrido el
          shock térmico. La capacidad aumentada de la respuesta oxidativa en
          los neutrófilos puede ser la causa inicial que conduce al daño
          orgánico múltiple en el shock por quemaduras.   Postal Address: Dr. M. M. Sayeed, Burn and Shock Trauma
          Institute, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
          E-mail: msayeed@wpo.it.luc.edu   I. Shock: The outcome of an inflammatory response The phenomenon of shock after trauma injuries with or without
          severe blood loss was well recognized in the early to mid 1800s1.
          Subsequent observations in injured humans as well as in animal models
          of shock have documented disturbances in individual organ systems
          within the body. Starting with the initial observations implicating
          shock-induced derangements in the nervous system2, studies in the
          field of shock have identified adverse effects in the heart and
          vascular system followed, but not necessarily in a set order, by
          disturbances in the pulmonary, renal, and hepatic functions3. More
          recent observations have given credence to shock-related damage in the
          gastrointestinal absorptive and mucosal barrier functions4. The
          concepts of shock culminating in multiple organ system dysfunction of
          failure was promulgated by Professor Arthur Baue in the early 1980s5.
          Figure 1 illustrates the emergence of the sepsis syndrome, also known
          as SIRS (systemic inflammatory response syndrome), after acute
          injuries such as hemorrhage, burn, trauma or major surgical
          procedures. Also shown in the figure is the role of gut bacterial
          translocation occurring in the sepsis syndrome and shock. Several
          studies have shown that trauma and related injuries induce an
          inflammatory response accompanied by the release of a vast variety of
          mediators from cells of both the “immune” and “non-immune”
          systems within the body6. The mediators play a role in both an early
          adaptive activation as well as a late adverse exacerbation of the
          functions of the various organ systems. Although the recent findings
          have to a large extent recognized the chemical nature and the cellular
          sources of these mediators, their induction, expression and release at
          specific tissue sites, and the mechanisms of their actions at various
          target cells and tissues remain principal objectives of ongoing
          investigations. The mediators’ actions on their target cells have
          been designated as either pro- or anti-inflammatory depending on
          whether they promote or suppress inflammation7. The actions of the
          mediator may be exerted either on cells that themselves produce
          mediators (autocrine responses), or cells in juxtaposition to the
          mediator-producing cells (paracrine responses), or cells distant from
          the mediator-producing cells (endocrine responses).The research initiated in the author’s laboratory in the late 1980s
          has since focused on intracellular signaling pathways in cells of the
          “immune” as well as the “non-immune” systems. One research
          objective has been to determine atlerations in signaling pathways that
          might be responsible for the altered cellular responses contributing
          to damage or dysfunction in the bodily functions in the inflammatory
          response syndrome. Our studies were carried out mainly in rat models
          of sepsis and burn injury leading to an overt state of inflammatory
          response and shock.
 This review primarily focuses on studies which evaluated the
          intracellular signalling pathways in the polymorphonuclear neutrophils
          from rats with a burn injury.The reviewer has previously summarized
          the findings in the non-immune cell systems (hepatocytes, skeletal
          myocytes)8 and in T lymphocytes9 harvested from animals with a
          sepsis-induced injury.
 II. Inflammatory response affects signaling in neutrophils A number of studies have shown polymorphonuclear neutrophils to be
          activated in an early phase of the inflammatory response syndrome to
          produce excessive quantities of superoxide free radical along with
          enhanced chemotactic, chemokinetic and phagocytic responses10, 11.
          Such an activation of neutrophils can evidently provide for their
          enhanced migration across the microvasculature at tissue sites of
          infection/inflammation within the body, and for the presumed
          O2--related killing of the invading microorganisms. However, the
          enhanced neutrophil activation can also lead to injury to the host’s
          own cells/tissues. The host cell/tissue injury could be related not
          only to excessive production of O2- and O2--derived reactive molecular
          species (e.g., H2O2, the hypochlorous and carboxyl anions), which
          cause oxidative damage to cell/membrane lipids and proteins, but also
          the hydrolytic enzymes released by neutrophils12. The host tissue
          injury might also be due to attentuation in the activity of scavenger
          enzyme systems responsible for the clearance of the O2- and related
          molecular species. The activation of neutrophils in the inflammatory
          conditions is presumably effected by the mediators, such as the
          bacteria-derived formyl peptides (e.g., fMLP,
          formylmethionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine), activated comple-ment (e.g.,
          C5a), and a host of mediators released from leukocytes themselves,
          such as cytokines, tumor necrosis factor (TNFa), interleukin-8 (IL-8)
          or its homologs, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF), and
          lipid mediators, platelet activating factor (PAF) and leukotriene B4
          (LTB4). All of these mediators have been shown to be released either
          systemically or regionally in tissues in trauma, septic, and burn
          injury conditions13. Furthermore, there is experimental evidence that
          not only each of these mediators by itself can activate neutrophils
          but that there might be a potentiation of the effect of one of these
          in the presence of one or more of the other mediators. Thus, it is
          reasonable to assume that there may be an optimum potentiation of the
          actions of the neutrophil-activating mediators generated after trauma,
          burn or septic injuries. Figure 2 depicts a flow diagram of
          trauma/burn/sepsis-related upregulation of the neutrophil-activating
          agents and their potential role in modifying the signaling pathways
          leading to increased activation of the neutrophils’ O2--producing
          membrane enzyme, NADPH oxidase11.Our experimental approach to assess the potential role of the
          mediators in the altered regulation of neutrophil intracellular
          signaling was to isolate circulating neutrophils from burn-injured
          rats and then assay their signaling activities in the basal state and
          after their stimulation with fMLP in vitro. The neutrophil signaling
          events assessed were: 1) cytosolic Ca2+ concentration, ([Ca2+]i), and
          2) activation of protein kinase C (PKC). In addition we carried out
          measurements of neutrophil O2- production in the presence of fMLP. It
          was assumed that injury per se had altered the neutrophil cytosolic
          [Ca2+] and PKC responses which would be reflective in the basal state
          measu-rements. The determination of neutrophil activities in the
          presence of exogenous fMLP presumably evaluated the extent to which
          injured animal neutrophils could be further activated to yield maximal
          intracellular responses. The basal and fMLP-mediated activities in the
          burn-injured rat neutrophils were compared with those observed in
          neutrophils from the sham controls. Also, our studies determined the
          effectiveness of the treatment of burn-injured rats with the calcium
          antagonist diltiazem on the neutrophil Ca2+ and PKC signaling
          pathways. The administration of the calcium antagonist as a
          therapeutic agent was warranted on the basis of our previous studies
          showing its efficacy against an upregulation of intracellular calcium
          signaling in hepatocytes and skeletal myocytes of the septic injured
          animals9. Although diltiazem is known principally to block the
          voltage-sensitive calcium channels, at relatively higher
          concentrations it also serves as a blocker of the receptor gated Ca2+
          channels in a variety of cell systems14. Our previous studies have
          shown diltiazem’s ability to block the receptor-gated calcium
          channel in the hepatocytes which are known to lack the
          voltage-sensitive calcium channels15.
 The basal neutrophil cytosolic [Ca2+] and PKC activity presumably
          represent the state of one of the neutrophils’ well studied
          signaling networks that is activated by a number of but not all of the
          neutrophil-activating mediators. For example, whereas fMLP, C5a, LTB4,
          and PAF are known to activate the Ca2+ and PKC linked pathways, and
          TNF-a and GCSF may act through a Ca2+ independent pathway16. Although
          TNF-a and GCSF by themselves may not activate the calcium linked
          signaling, they may potentiate the actions of other calcium
          signal-activating mediators. These considerations lend support to the
          concept that activation of the intracellular calcium linked pathways
          may lead to an optimum potentiation of the neutrophil responses in
          conditions accompanying release of the various inflammatory mediators.
          The known link between the Ca2+ and PKC signaling components and their
          combined effect to potentiate the activity of the NADPH oxidase enzyme
          system in neutrophils17 would imply that burn/sepsis-related
          perturbations in the Ca2+ signal would also lead to simulatenous
          alterations in PKC activation as well as the related effector
          response, namely O2- generation. In our studies, we quantified [Ca2+]i
          and PKC activation along with assessments of O2- production in
          neutrophils isolated from sham-operated and burn-injured rats. A
          scalding burn injury was produced in anesthetized rats by exposing 25%
          of their total body surface area to 95°C water for a period of 4-5
          seconds. This protocol was shown to result in a full thickness skin
          burn. Whereas rats studied 1-3 days after the burns were designated as
          those showing early effects of the injury, rats studied 7-10 days
          after the burn were assumed to be in a late injury phase. Details of
          the rat burn protocol have been described in earlier reports from our
          laboratory19, 20. The methods of isolating neutrophils, and of
          measurements of neutrophil [Ca2+]i and PKC activities have also been
          described in detail in the earlier publications. Briefly, [Ca2+]i was
          measured by initially labeling neutrophils with the membrane permanent
          fluorescent Ca2+ chelating dye Fura 2. Fluorescent signals from the
          labeled neutrophils, before and after their stimulation with fMLP,
          were fluorometrically quantified, and the resultant fluorescence
          intensities converted into Ca2+ concentration values. PKC activities
          in the neutrophil cytosolic and membrane fractions were determined
          after incubating the cell fractions with a synthetic peptide,
          homologous to a sequence of myelin basic protein, and quantitating the
          incorporation of 32P derived from ATP into the peptide. An increase in
          the 32P incorporation in the membrane fraction along with its decrease
          in the cystosolic fraction after neutrophil stimulation with fMLP was
          taken to represent PKC translocation from the cytosol to membrane and
          thus its activation. The neutrophil O2- production was assessed by
          spectrophotometrically quantifying the reduction of ferricytochrome c.
 Neutrophil Ca2+ signaling responses in the early (day 3 post-burn) to
          a late (day 10 post-burn) phase after burn injury are shown in Figure
          3. The basal [Ca2+]i on day 3 post-burn was greater than 2x the level
          in the sham group. However, on day 10 post-burn the basal [Ca2+]i was
          either comparable to or less than that found in the sham controls.
          This suggested that neutrophil Ca2+ responses were significantly
          upregulated in the early but not in the later phases after the burn
          injury. The elevated basal [Ca2+]i on day 3 post-burn can be
          attributed to an effect of the inflammatory mediators released into
          circulation during the early course of injury. Although the identity
          of the mediators remains unknown, it is reasonable to assume that
          multiple endogenous mediators contributed to the heightened Ca2+
          response. The effect of neutrophil stimulation by fMLP, in vitro,
          further assessed the enhanced responsiveness of neutrophils harvested
          from the day 3 burn rats. The enhanced responsiveness to fMLP on day 3
          (Figure 3) was apparently due not only to the increased basal [Ca2+]i
          but due also to the effect of fMLP per se; this was evident after
          calculating the D values ([Ca2+]i fMLP-[Ca2+]i basal). The neutrophils
          isolated ten days after burn showed Ca2+ responses which were not
          different from those in the sham controls.
 The results of measurements of PKC activity in the neutrophil membrane
          fractions are given in Figure 4. There was an apparent enhancement in
          both the basal and fMLP mediated membrane PKC in neutrophils of rats 3
          days after the burn compared to the sham group values. On day 7 after
          burn, whereas there was an attenuation in both the basal and
          fMLP-mediated membrane PKC activities compared to the day 3 burn group
          values, the activities on the day 7 post-burn were still somewhat
          higher than in the sham control group. These findings suggested an
          upregulation in neutrophil PKC signaling on day 3 post-burn in
          parallel with the upregulation in the Ca2+ responses. A parallel
          upregulation on day 3 post-burn was also noted in the neutrophil O2-
          production (Figure 5).
 Figures 6, 7 and 8 respectively show the effects of treatment of burn
          rats with the Ca2+ antagonist diltiazem (2 mg/kg) on Ca2+, PKC and O2-
          generative responses. The diltiazem treatment had no significant
          effect in the sham rats. Both the basal and fMLP-mediated Ca2+
          responses in the diltiazem treated day 3 post-burn rats were
          significantly lower than those in the untreated burn group; day 3
          post-burn responses after treatment were comparable to those in the
          sham group (Figure 6). The effect of diltiazem treatment on the PKC
          responses in day 3 post-burn rats (Figure 7) was quite similar to that
          on Ca2+ responses. The diltiazem treatment apparently prevented
          upregulation in both Ca2+ and PKC signaling pathways observed on day 3
          post-burn. Furthermore, the treatment of burn rats with diltiazem
          effectively attenuated the burn-induced enhancement in neutrophil O2-
          production (Figure 8).
 III. Neutrophil signaling alterations contribute to enhanced
          potential for oxidative cell/tissue injury The foregoing results of signaling assessments in neutrophils from
          burn-injured animals clearly demonstrate that Ca2+ and PKC pathways in
          these leukocytes are “hyperactive”. The latter term is warranted
          in as much as maximum levels of Ca2+ and PKC activities in fMLP
          challenged neutrophils from injured animals were resolutely found to
          be higher than in neutrophils from control animals. Furthermore, the
          finding that basal [Ca2+]i and actived PKC levels in the 3 days
          post-burn animal neutrophils were higher than in controls supports the
          concept that development of the “hyperactive” state of neutrophil
          signaling occurs during an early phase of burn injury. At later stages
          of injury, namely days 7 and 10 post burn, there was an apparent
          subsiding of the “hyperactive” state.It can be reasonably assumed that the injury-related release of
          neutrophil-activating mediators play a role in the “hyperactivation”
          of neutrophil signaling pathways during the early burn injury phase.
          Although the precise identity of such mediators affecting the
          signaling systems remains unknown, the various known chemotactic
          agents/mediators released after burn injury (e.g. C5a, formyl peptides
          derived from the invading bacteria IL-8 homo-logs, TNFa, LTB4, PAF,
          GCSF)10 are likely responsible for the alterations in signaling
          pathways. Previous studies have shown that neutrophil Ca2+ and PKC
          activities are potentiated by the actions of various combinations of
          the aforementioned mediators16. Thus the observed “hyperactivation”
          of Ca2+ and PKC signaling in burn-injured animal neutrophils could
          result from neutrophil hypersensitization to the multiple mediators
          acting in concert or at some time intervals during the burn
          pathogenesis. Previous studies have referred to such
          hypersensitization of neutrophils during injury states as a “priming”
          phenomenon19. Primed neutrophils presumably exhibit an enhanced
          ability to infiltrate into tissues subsequent to their adhesion to
          endothelium, and migration across the vascular wall and through the
          tissue interstitium, and eventually their release of O2- and
          hydrolytic enzymes. Based on our findings, we postulate that under
          pathophysiologic conditions which lead to recovery from injury, the
          priming of neutrophils allows them to migrate through the vascular
          wall to the interstitial sites of injury/infection and then to release
          O2- and the proteolytic enzymes in such a controlled manner that
          adverse oxidative/proteolytic effects are exerted on the pathogens but
          not on host cells/tissues. On the other hand, the postulate would
          entail that under certain conditions a hyperactivation or priming of
          neutrophils occurs to such an extent that they release both O2- and
          proteolyte enzymes as they migrate through the vascular wall and
          through the interstitium. Such inappropriate releases of
          O2-/proteolytic enzymes can understandably injure endothelial
          permeability and interstitial/parenchymal functions in host tissues.
          The resulting endothelial/microvascular permeability dysfunction and
          interstitial/parenchymal damage can conceivably contribute to one or
          more organ/system dysfunction/failure leading to a lethal outcome. The
          multiple organ/system disturbances emanating from the early burn
          mediated neutrophil “hyperactivity” could become manifest at later
          stages of burn injury even though the neutrophil responses themselves
          may not be upregulated in the later stages.
 The findings summarized here show an excessive production of O2- along
          with the upregulation of signaling pathways (viz. Ca2+ and PKC)
          responsible for the O2- production in neutrophils in an early stage of
          burn injury. Our findings support the linkage between the
          hypersensitization of the Ca2+ and PKC pathways and excessive O2-
          production as both the signaling and the O2- release responses were
          prevented subsequent to the treatment of the injured animals with the
          calcium antagonist diltiazem. Diltiazem likely served to control the
          Ca2+ response which in turn could modulate PKC activation and O2-
          generation.
 Although our studies do not provide any evidence for host cell/tissue
          damage associated with the increased neutrophil O2- production, they
          lend credence to the concept that hypersensitization of neutrophil
          signaling pathways could primarily be responsible for an uncontrolled
          O2- production by the neutrophils.
 Acknowledgements: The author gratefully acknowledges the
          able assistance of Farideh Sabeh, Ph.D. who, during her tenure as a
          post-doctoral research associate in the laboratory, conducted the
          experiments reported in this review. The research in the author’s
          laboratory was supported by U.S. National Institutes of Health grants
          ROI GM 568501 and ROI GM 53235. References 1. Wiggers CJ. Physiology of Shock. New York: The Commonwealth
          Fund. 1950.2. Leyden E. In Klinik der Rückenmarks-Krankheiten. Berlin:
          Hirshwald. 1875.
 3. Baue AE. Multiple, progressive or sequential system failure. Arch
          Surg 1975; 110: 779-81.
 4. Deitch EA. The role of intestinal barrier failure and bacterial
          translocation in the development of systemic infection and multiple
          organ failure. Arch Surg 1990; 125: 403-4.
 5. Baue AE. Multiple organ or system failure. In: Haimovici H et al
          (eds). Vascular Emergencies. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1981.
 6. Hinder F, Traber DL. Pathophysiology of the systemic inflammatory
          response syndrome. In: Herndon DN (ed). Total Burn Care. London: WB
          Saunders 1996; 207-16.
 7. Dinarello CA. Pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines as
          mediators in the pathogenesis of septic shock. Chest 1997; 3215-95.
 8. Sayeed MM. Alterations in calcium signaling and cellular responses
          in septic injury. In: Sayeed MM, Papadakes PJ (eds). New Horizons:
          Calcium Homeostasis. Baltimore: William and Wilkins, 1996; 72-86.
 9. Sayeed MM. Alterations in calcium signaling and related effector
          responses in T lymphocytes in burn/traumatic/peptic injuries. Shock
          1996; 5: 157-66.
 10. Arturson G. Pathophysiology of the burn wound and pharmacological
          treatment. Burns 1996;22: 255-74.
 11. Smith JA. Neutrophils, host defense, and inflammation: a
          double-edged sword. J Leukoc Biol 1994; 672-86.
 12. Weiss SJ. Tissue destruction by neutrophils. N Engl J Med 1989;
          320: 365-76.
 13. Barlow YT, Lymphocytes and immune suppression in the burn patient:
          review. Burns 1994; 20: 487-94.
 14. Muallem S. Calcium transport by resting and stimulated cells. In:
          Bronner F (ed). Intracellular calcium regulation. New York:
          Wiley-Liss, 1990; 349-80.
 15. Sayeed MM, Maitra SR. Effect of diltiazem on cellular calcium
          regulation during endotoxic shock. Am J Physiol 1987; 253: R549-R54.
 16. Hallett MB, Lloyds D. Neutrophil priming: the cellular signals
          that say ‘amber’ but not ‘green’. Immunol Today 1995; 16:
          264-8.
 17. Majumdar S, Kane LH, Ross MW, Volpp BD, Naus WM, Korchak HM.
          Protein Kinase C isotopes and signed transduction in human
          neutrophils: selective substrate specificity of calcium dependent
          beta-PKC and calcium independent nPKC. Biochem Biophys Acta 1993;
          1176: 276-86.
 18. Fazal N, Sabeh F, Gamelli RL, Sayeed MM. Elevated expression of
          p47 phox and p67 phox proteins in neutrophils from burned rats. Shock
          1997; 8: 256-60.
 19. Anderson BO, Harken AH. Multiple organ failure: inflammatory
          priming and activation sequences promote autologous tissue injury. J
          Trauma 1990; 30: 544-9.
 
 Fig. 1.– Schematic diagram showing emergence of sepsis syndrome
          after various forms of acute injuries, e.g. burn, trauma etc., and the
          potential causal relationship between the sepsis syndrome and multiple
          organ dysfunction. The diagram also emphasizes the injury conditions
          effecting translocation of bacteria across the gastrointestinal wall
          to lead to the sepsis syndrome. SIRS = systemic inflammatory response
          syndrome.
 Fig. 2.– Schematic diagram depicting the role of injury-induced
          inflammatory mediators in the activation of neutrophil signaling
          pathways responsible for regulating O2--generating membrane enzyme
          NADPH oxidase. Also shown in the diagram is the potential injurious
          effect of excessive O2- generation on host tissues. LPS =
          lipopolysaccharide, PTK = protein tyrosine kinase, MAPK = mitogen
          activated protein kinase; see text for other abbreviations in the
          figure.
 Fig. 3.– Basal and fMLP-elevated [Ca2+]i in neutrophils from sham
          and day 3 and day 10 post-burn rats. The differences in basal and
          fMLP-elevated [Ca2+]i are shown as D values. Bars represent mean ± SE
          values.
 Fig. 4.– Basal and fMLP-mediated PKC activities in the cystosolic
          and membrane fractions of neutrophils from sham and da6 3 and day 7
          post-burn rats. Bars represent mean ± SE values.
 Fig. 5.– O2- release rate and total O2- released from neutrophils of
          sham and day 3 and day 10 post-burn rats. Bars represent mean ± SE
          values.
 Fig. 6.– Basal (A) and fMLP-mediated (B) [Ca2+[i in neutrophils from
          diltiazem (DZ) treated and untreated sham and day 3 and day 7
          post-burn rats. Bars are mean ± SE values.
 Fig. 7.– Basal (A) and fMLP-mediated (B) membrane PKC activities in
          neutrophils from diltiazem (DZ) treated and untreated sham and day 3
          and day 7 post-burn rats. Bars are mean ± SE values.
 Fig. 8.– O2- release by neutrophils from diltiazem (DZ) treated and
          untreated sham and da6 3 and da6 10 post-burn rats. Bars are mean ±
          SE values.
 
  
         |   |  |  |  |